Sex differences in outcomes after revascularization for acute lower limb ischemia: Propensity score adjusted analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have suggested higher rates of mortality and amputation for female patients in acute lower limb ischemia (ALI). The aims of the present study were to investigate if there is a difference in mortality, amputation, and fasciotomy between the sexes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing index revascularization for ALI between 2001 and 2018 was conducted. A propensity score was created through a logistic regression with female/male sex as an outcome. Cox regression analyses for 90-day and 1-year mortality, combining major amputation/mortality, and logistic regression for major bleeding and fasciotomy, were performed. All analyses were performed with and without adjusting for propensity score. RESULTS: A total of 709 patients were included in the study of which 45.9% were women. Mean age was 72.1 years. Females were older and had higher rates of atrial fibrillation, embolic disease, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, while men more often had anemia and chronic peripheral arterial disease. Mortality at 1 year was 21.2% for women and 14.7% for men. The adjusted hazard ratio for 1-year mortality was 0.99 (95% CI 0.67-1.46). Fasciotomy was performed in 7.1% of female and 12.8% of male patients; the adjusted odds ratio was 0.52 (95% CI 0.29-0.91). CONCLUSION: Sex was not found to be an independent risk factor for mortality or combined major amputation/mortality after revascularization for acute lower limb ischemia, whereas women had lower odds of undergoing fasciotomy. Whether women are underdiagnosed or do not develop acute compartment syndrome in the lower leg as often as men should be evaluated prospectively.

Short-Term Complications and Outcomes in Pharmaco-Mechanical Thrombolysis First and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis First in Patients with Acute Lower Limb Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Pharmaco-mechanical thrombolysis (PMT) has emerged as a treatment option in patients with acute lower limb ischemia (ALI), especially Rutherford IIb (motor deficit) for rapid revascularization, but supportive data is scarce. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of thrombolysis, complications, and outcomes of PMT first versus catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) first in a large cohort of patients with ALI. METHODS: All endovascular thrombolytic/thrombectomy events in patients with ALI performed between January 1st, 2009, and December 31st, 2018 (n = 347) were included. Successful thrombolysis/thrombectomy was defined as complete or partial lysis. Reasons for using PMT were described. Complications such as major bleeding, distal embolization, and new onset of renal impairment, and major amputation and mortality at 30 days were compared between PMT (AngioJet) first and CDT first groups in a multivariable logistic regression model with adjustment for age, gender, atrial fibrillation, and Rutherford IIb. RESULTS: The most common reason for initial use of PMT was the need for rapid revascularization, and the most common reason for use of PMT after CDT was the insufficient effect of CDT. Presentation of Rutherford IIb ALI was more common in the PMT first group (36.2% vs. 22.5%, respectively, P = 0.027). Among the 58 patients receiving PMT first, 36 (62.1%) were terminated within a single session of therapy without need of CDT. The median duration of thrombolysis was shorter (P < 0.001) for the PMT first group (n = 58) compared to the CDT first group (n = 289) (4.0 hr vs. 23.0 hr, respectively). There was no significant difference in amount of tissue plasminogen activator given, successful thrombolysis/thrombectomy (86.2% and 84.8%), major bleeding (15.5% and 18.7%), distal embolization (25.9% and 16.6%), major amputation or mortality at 30-days (13.8% and 7.7%) in the PMT first compared to the CDT first group, respectively. The proportion of new onset of renal impairment was higher in the PMT first compared to the CDT first group (10.3% vs. 3.8%, respectively), and the increased odds (odds ratio 3.57, 95% confidence interval 1.22-10.41) were maintained in the adjusted model. In Rutherford IIb ALI, no difference in rate of successful thrombolysis/thrombectomy (76.2% and 73.8%), complications or 30-day outcomes was found between PMT first (n = 21) and CDT (n = 65) first group. CONCLUSIONS: PMT first appears to be a good treatment alternative to CDT in patients with ALI, including Rutherford IIb. The found renal function deterioration in the PMT first group needs to be evaluated in a prospective, preferably randomized trial.

Prophylactic and Therapeutic Fasciotomy for Acute Compartment Syndrome after Revascularization for Acute Lower Limb Ischemia-Renal and Wound Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Acute Compartment Syndrome (ACS) is a significant complication after revascularization for acute lower limb ischemia (ALI). High risk patients sometimes undergo prophylactic fasciotomy (PF) to prevent ACS. Patients that develop ACS undergo therapeutic fasciotomy (TF). The optimal timing of fasciotomy has been debated. The aim of this study was to describe and compare renal and wound outcomes in patients undergoing PF and TF. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including 76 patients undergoing PF (n = 40) or TF (n = 36) after revascularization for ALI between 2006 and 2018. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) was used to evaluate renal function and compare within (paired-samples t-test) and between (analysis of variance) groups. Wound complications and healing time were compiled from the complete wound healing period and compared between groups with Pearson's chi-squared-and log-rank test, respectively. RESULTS: E-GFR improved over the in-hospital period with 8.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4-14.1, P = 0.007) in the PF group and 4.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI 1.2-7.7, P = 0.010) in the TF group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (0.3 ml/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI -6.7 to 7.4, P = 0.93). The wound infection rate was higher after TF (PF = 60.6 % and TF = 82.4 %, P = 0.048), whereas rate of other wound complications (PF = 61.3 % and TF = 35.3%, P = 0.036) was higher after PF. CONCLUSIONS: Overall wound complications were high, whereas renal function improved during in-hospital stay. A more conservative approach to fasciotomy could avoid unnecessary fasciotomies and reduce wound complications, while holding the potential to sufficiently preserve renal function if fasciotomy is needed for ACS. This would be possible and safe if an early diagnosis and treatment of ACS can be ensured.

Risk Factors for Fasciotomy After Revascularization for Acute Lower Limb Ischaemia.

Background: Acute lower limb ischaemia (ALI) is a life and limb threatening vascular emergency. Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) may develop upon revascularization. The risk of fasciotomy was hypothesized to be decreased in women due to their lower calf muscle mass. The main aim was to evaluate risk factors for fasciotomy after revascularization for ALI. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing revascularization for ALI between 2001 and 2018. Factors associated with outcome at 1 year in univariable analysis (p < 0.1) were chosen for multi-variable analysis and expressed in Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The median age for women (n = 394) was 75 years and men (n = 449) was 70 years (p < 0.001). The frequency of fasciotomy was 10.0% (84/843). The median in-hospital stay was 28 vs. 6 days for patients undergoing fasciotomy and not, respectively (p < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, renal insufficiency (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.04-3.01), motor deficit (OR 4.40, 95% CI 2.45-7.92), popliteal artery aneurysm thromboembolism (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.06-4.80), and open vascular surgery (OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.97-5.98) were associated with an increased risk of fasciotomy. Female patients (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.84) and anemia (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.84) had a lower risk. The major amputation/mortality rate at 1-year was 27.7%; fasciotomy (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.11-3.40), anemia (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.24-2.73) and female gender (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.00-2.08) were independently associated with an increased risk. Conclusions: Female patients had lower rates of fasciotomies, but subsequent higher risk of major amputation/mortality, which may be attributed to inferior results of revascularization. Lower muscle mass and underdiagnosis of ACS could also explain the lower frequency of fasciotomy for female patients. Further studies are needed to better understand gender differences in presentation of ALI, revascularization results and diagnosis of ACS.

Low-Dose Oral Ketamine for Procedural Analgesia in Pediatric Cancer Patients Undergoing Lumbar Puncture at a Resource-Limited Cancer Hospital in India.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety profile of orally administered low-dose ketamine for procedural pain management in pediatric cancer patients undergoing lumbar puncture (LP) in a resource-limited hospital setting. Methods: Patients between 4 and 15 years of age, with leukemia, undergoing LP were asked to participate. The study was designed as a two-armed blinded placebo-controlled trial where 0.8 mg/kg (bodyweight) of ketamine mixed in juice was given 30 minutes before the procedure to Group K (ketamine) compared with placebo, only juice, to Group P (placebo). In addition, topical analgesia (EMLA®) was given according to established standard of care. Patients and caregivers assessed the pain using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale. Results: A total number of 52 patients, equally distributed between Group K and Group P, were included in the study. The placebo-controlled group had significantly higher self-reported pain score than the group receiving ketamine (p = 0.046), as well as in caregiver-assessed pain (p = 0.033). Only three incidents of mild adverse effects were reported. Conclusion: Low-dose oral ketamine can be safely administered for procedural analgesia in pediatric cancer patients undergoing LP in a resource-limited hospital setting and have significant pain-reducing effect compared with placebo.